Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.

Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.

245 A.D.2d 1112, 666 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13917
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1997
StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 1112 (Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gadley v. U.S. Sugar Co., 245 A.D.2d 1112, 666 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Absent prejudice to a defendant, “a motion to amend the ad damnum clause, whether made before or after trial, should generally be granted” (Loomis v Civetta [1113]*1113Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 23, rearg denied 55 NY2d 801; see, Smith v Lift-A-Loft Equip., 210 AD2d 989). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.— Amend Complaint.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Callahan, Balio and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.
429 N.E.2d 90 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Smith v. Lift-A-Loft Equipment, Inc.
210 A.D.2d 989 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 1112, 666 N.Y.S.2d 96, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gadley-v-us-sugar-co-nyappdiv-1997.