Home/Supreme Court/Smith v. Leavenworth

Smith v. Leavenworth

235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 9, 1914
DocketNo. 41
StatusPublished

This text of 235 U.S. 690 (Smith v. Leavenworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Leavenworth, 235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205 (1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Rogers v. Jones, 214 U. S. 196, 204; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677; (2) Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674; de Bearn v. Safe Deposit Co., 233 U. S. 24, 34; McDonald v. Oregon Navigation Co., 233 U. S. 665, 670; (3) New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana, 185 U. S. 336, 344; Gring v. Ives, 222 U. S. 365, 370; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. [691]*691652.

Mr. John W. Cutrer and Mr. O. G. Johnston for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Gerald FitzGerald and Mr. Edward Mayes for . the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. McConnico
168 U.S. 674 (Supreme Court, 1898)
New Orleans Waterworks Co. v. Louisiana
185 U.S. 336 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Rogers v. Jones
214 U.S. 196 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Gring v. Ives
222 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Wood v. Chesborough
228 U.S. 672 (Supreme Court, 1913)
De Bearn v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. of Baltimore
233 U.S. 24 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis
233 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1914)
McDonald v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.
233 U.S. 665 (Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 U.S. 690, 35 S. Ct. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-leavenworth-scotus-1914.