Smith v. Lampert

25 P.3d 984, 174 Or. App. 581
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJune 13, 2001
Docket99-05-30, 525-M A107587
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 25 P.3d 984 (Smith v. Lampert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Lampert, 25 P.3d 984, 174 Or. App. 581 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

25 P.3d 984 (2001)
174 Or. App. 581

Mark Lynn SMITH, Appellant,
v.
Robert LAMPERT, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.

99-05-30, 525-M; A107587.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2001.
Decided June 13, 2001.

Bob Pangburn, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Kaye E. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his writ of habeas corpus. The appeal is moot by virtue of plaintiff's completion of his incarceration in segregation after the trial court entered its judgment. See generally Pham v. Thompson, 156 Or.App. 440, 965 P.2d 482 (1998), rev den 328 Or. 246, 987 P.2d 507 (1999).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frederick v. City of Portland
38 P.3d 288 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 P.3d 984, 174 Or. App. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lampert-orctapp-2001.