Smith v. Lampert
This text of 25 P.3d 984 (Smith v. Lampert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark Lynn SMITH, Appellant,
v.
Robert LAMPERT, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Bob Pangburn, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.
Kaye E. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his writ of habeas corpus. The appeal is moot by virtue of plaintiff's completion of his incarceration in segregation after the trial court entered its judgment. See generally Pham v. Thompson, 156 Or.App. 440, 965 P.2d 482 (1998), rev den 328 Or. 246, 987 P.2d 507 (1999).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 P.3d 984, 174 Or. App. 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-lampert-orctapp-2001.