Smith v. Konica Business Machines, USA, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Konica Business Machines, USA, Inc.

232 A.D.2d 398, 648 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 232 A.D.2d 398 (Smith v. Konica Business Machines, USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Konica Business Machines, USA, Inc., 232 A.D.2d 398, 648 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated November 20, 1995, which denied its motion to compel the plaintiff Sylvester Smith to appear for a further examination before trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The instant appeal is, in effect, from an order determining an application to review objections raised at an examination before trial. Such an order is not appealable as a matter of right (see, Lachowski v Lehrer McGovern Bovis, 220 AD2d 390; Scalone v Phelps Mem. Hosp. Ctr., 184 AD2d 65, 69; Stoller v Moo Young Jun, 118 AD2d 637; Sainz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 106 AD2d 500). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Brien, J.), dated November 20, 1995, which denied its motion to compel the plaintiff Sylvester Smith to appear for a further examination before trial.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The instant appeal is, in effect, from an order determining an application to review objections raised at an examination before trial. Such an order is not appealable as a matter of right (see, Lachowski v Lehrer McGovern Bovis, 220 AD2d 390; Scalone v Phelps Mem. Hosp. Ctr., 184 AD2d 65, 69; Stoller v Moo Young Jun, 118 AD2d 637; Sainz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 106 AD2d 500). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Pizzuto, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D.2d 398, 648 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-konica-business-machines-usa-inc-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack