Cedrone v. Bon Secours Community Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cedrone v. Bon Secours Community Hospital

31 A.D.3d 596, 817 N.Y.S.2d 904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 18, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 A.D.3d 596 (Cedrone v. Bon Secours Community Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cedrone v. Bon Secours Community Hospital, 31 A.D.3d 596, 817 N.Y.S.2d 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), entered February 8, 2005, as, in effect, denied that branch of their motion which was to compel a further examination before trial of a witness regarding certain photographs, and (2) an order of the same court entered April 4, 2005, as, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to preclude questioning regarding the subject photographs at the deposition of another witness.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The portion of the order entered February 8, 2005, which, in effect, denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel a further examination before trial of a witness regarding certain photographs, and the portion of the order entered April 4, 2005, which, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to preclude questioning regarding the subject photographs at the deposition of another witness, are not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701; Garcia v Jomber Realty, 264 AD2d 809, 810 [1999]; Smith v Konica Bus. Machs., USA, 232 AD2d 398 [1996]; Scalone v Phelps Mem. Hosp. Ctr., 184 AD2d 65, 69 [1992]; Sainz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 106 AD2d 500 [1984]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), entered February 8, 2005, as, in effect, denied that branch of their motion which was to compel a further examination before trial of a witness regarding certain photographs, and (2) an order of the same court entered April 4, 2005, as, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to preclude questioning regarding the subject photographs at the deposition of another witness.

Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, with one bill of costs.

The portion of the order entered February 8, 2005, which, in effect, denied that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to compel a further examination before trial of a witness regarding certain photographs, and the portion of the order entered April 4, 2005, which, in effect, granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to preclude questioning regarding the subject photographs at the deposition of another witness, are not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701; Garcia v Jomber Realty, 264 AD2d 809, 810 [1999]; Smith v Konica Bus. Machs., USA, 232 AD2d 398 [1996]; Scalone v Phelps Mem. Hosp. Ctr., 184 AD2d 65, 69 [1992]; Sainz v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 106 AD2d 500 [1984]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 596, 817 N.Y.S.2d 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cedrone-v-bon-secours-community-hospital-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack