Smith v. Haden
This text of 69 F.3d 606 (Smith v. Haden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[607]*607JUDGMENT
This case was heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is
Ordered that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion of December 23, 1994. See Smith v. Haden, 872 F.Supp. 1040 (D.D.C.1994). The cross-appeal is therefore moot.
The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 F.3d 606, 314 U.S. App. D.C. 442, 1995 WL 686063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-haden-cadc-1995.