Linda A. Smith, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Mabel D. Haden, Appellee/cross-Appellant

D.C. Circuit

Linda A. Smith, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Mabel D. Haden, Appellee/cross-Appellant

69 F.3d 606, 314 U.S. App. D.C. 442, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32593

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1995

Docket95-7014

StatusPublished

This text of 69 F.3d 606 (Linda A. Smith, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Mabel D. Haden, Appellee/cross-Appellant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Linda A. Smith, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Mabel D. Haden, Appellee/cross-Appellant, 69 F.3d 606, 314 U.S. App. D.C. 442, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 32593 (D.C. Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

69 F.3d 606

314 U.S.App.D.C. 442

Linda A. SMITH, Appellant/Cross-Appellee
v.
Mabel D. HADEN, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Nos. 95-7014, 95-7033.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 21, 1995.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.JUDGMENT

This case was heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is

Ordered that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion of December 23, 1994. See Smith v. Haden, 872 F.Supp. 1040 (D.D.C.1994). The cross-appeal is therefore moot.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI