Smith v. Geoghegan

114 N.Y.S. 29
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 114 N.Y.S. 29 (Smith v. Geoghegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Geoghegan, 114 N.Y.S. 29 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the time when the plaintiff paid the deposit of $100 to the defendant, there was certainly-no meeting of the minds of the parties upon a lease, since the lessor’s consent was concededly withheld, and the evidence justified the trial court in reaching the conclusion that this deposit was of a tentative character, and was made with the understanding that the plaintiff could withdraw it in three days, if he then determined not to take a lease. The case is within the rule applied in Aquelini v. Provident Realty Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 1014.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.
84 N.Y.S. 1014 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 N.Y.S. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-geoghegan-nyappterm-1909.