Smith v. Geoghegan
This text of 114 N.Y.S. 29 (Smith v. Geoghegan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the time when the plaintiff paid the deposit of $100 to the defendant, there was certainly-no meeting of the minds of the parties upon a lease, since the lessor’s consent was concededly withheld, and the evidence justified the trial court in reaching the conclusion that this deposit was of a tentative character, and was made with the understanding that the plaintiff could withdraw it in three days, if he then determined not to take a lease. The case is within the rule applied in Aquelini v. Provident Realty Co. (Sup.) 84 N. Y. Supp. 1014.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 N.Y.S. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-geoghegan-nyappterm-1909.