Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.

84 N.Y.S. 1014

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1014 (Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co., 84 N.Y.S. 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in the case fails to show a meeting of the minds of the contracting parties on the terms of the proposed lease. No lease was executed, and no rents became due by virtue of it. The $200 was left by plaintiff with defendant as a pledge of good faith, and good faith on the part of the defendant demanded its return when, upon inspection, the plaintiff refused to execute the lease.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The evidence in the case fails to show a meeting of the minds of the contracting parties on the terms of the proposed lease. No lease was executed, and no rents became due by virtue of it. The $200 was left by plaintiff with defendant as a pledge of good faith, and good faith on the part of the defendant demanded its return when, upon inspection, the plaintiff refused to execute the lease.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 1014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aquelina-v-provident-realty-co-nyappterm-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack