Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.
84 N.Y.S. 1014
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 18, 1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The evidence in the case fails to show a meeting of the minds of the contracting parties on the terms of the proposed lease. No lease was executed, and no rents became due by virtue of it. The $200 was left by plaintiff with defendant as a pledge of good faith, and good faith on the part of the defendant demanded its return when, upon inspection, the plaintiff refused to execute the lease.
The judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co., 84 N.Y.S. 1014 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
84 N.Y.S. 1014 (Aquelina v. Provident Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Geoghegan
114 N.Y.S. 29 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)