Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
519 So. 2d 686, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1988 WL 6597
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 29, 1988
DocketNo. BQ-286
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 519 So. 2d 686 (Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 519 So. 2d 686, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1988 WL 6597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Having failed to allege in his petition that he had exhausted his administrative remedies, appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was properly dismissed. Gibson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 450 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wilson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
528 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
519 So. 2d 686, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1988 WL 6597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1988.