Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
519 So. 2d 686, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1988 WL 6597
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 29, 1988·No. No. BQ-286·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Having failed to allege in his petition that he had exhausted his administrative remedies, appellant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus was properly dismissed. Gibson v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 450 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 519 So. 2d 686, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 295, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 369, 1988 WL 6597 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
519 So. 2d 686 (Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
528 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)