Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

450 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 26, 1984
DocketNo. AV-461
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 450 So. 2d 553 (Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 450 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the presumptive parole release date established by the Commission is affirmed because appellant failed to allege in his petition, or show by providing an appendix, that he had exhausted his administrative remedies. See Houston v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 377 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coto v. Florida Commission on Offender Review
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
S. J. v. Malcolm Thomas
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017
Holcomb v. Department of Corrections
609 So. 2d 751 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Wilson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
528 So. 2d 1216 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Smith v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
519 So. 2d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
450 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gibson-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1984.