Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

450 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 1984·No. No. AV-461·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the presumptive parole release date established by the Commission is affirmed because appellant failed to allege in his petition, or show by providing an appendix, that he had exhausted his administrative remedies. See Houston v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 377 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court’s denial of appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking review of the presumptive parole release date established by the Commission is affirmed because appellant failed to allege in his petition, or show by providing an appendix, that he had exhausted his administrative remedies. See Houston v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 377 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ„ concur.

Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 450 So. 2d 553, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

450 So. 2d 553 (Gibson v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related