Smith v. Finney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Smith v. Finney

104 N.E. 887, 56 Ind. App. 93, 1914 Ind. App. LEXIS 10

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 1914

DocketNo. 8,326

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 104 N.E. 887 (Smith v. Finney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Finney, 104 N.E. 887, 56 Ind. App. 93, 1914 Ind. App. LEXIS 10 (Ind. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Ibach, J.

[94]*941. 2. [93]*93Appellants’ briefs utterly fail to comply with the rules of this court. Among other defects, no proposi[94]*94turns or points are stated, nor are any authorities cited in support of any error attempted to he presented, and for this reason alone nothing is before us for our consideration. Rupel v. Ohio Oil Co. (1911), 176 Ind. 4, 95 N. E. 225, Ann. Cas. 1913 E. 836; Albaugh Bros., etc., Co. v. Lynas (1911), 47 Ind. App. 30, 93 N. E. 678; Schilling v. Quinn (1912), 178 Ind. 443, 99 N. E. 740. However, upon examination of the transcript, we find no assignment of errors. An assignment of errors is necessary to give this court jurisdiction. Elliott, App. Proc. §303; Ewbank’s Manual §124. In the absence of an assignment of errors, the cause must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 104 N. E. 887. See, also, under (1) 2 Cyc. 1013. (2) 2 Cyc. 1010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ibach, J.

[94]*941. 2. [93]*93Appellants’ briefs utterly fail to comply with the rules of this court. Among other defects, no proposi[94]*94turns or points are stated, nor are any authorities cited in support of any error attempted to he presented, and for this reason alone nothing is before us for our consideration. Rupel v. Ohio Oil Co. (1911), 176 Ind. 4, 95 N. E. 225, Ann. Cas. 1913 E. 836; Albaugh Bros., etc., Co. v. Lynas (1911), 47 Ind. App. 30, 93 N. E. 678; Schilling v. Quinn (1912), 178 Ind. 443, 99 N. E. 740. However, upon examination of the transcript, we find no assignment of errors. An assignment of errors is necessary to give this court jurisdiction. Elliott, App. Proc. §303; Ewbank’s Manual §124. In the absence of an assignment of errors, the cause must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 104 N. E. 887. See, also, under (1) 2 Cyc. 1013. (2) 2 Cyc. 1010.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 N.E. 887, 56 Ind. App. 93, 1914 Ind. App. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-finney-indctapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack