Smith v. Featherly
242 A.D. 886, 275 N.Y.S. 256
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1934·Published
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The County Court may not, on motion, set aside a voidable judgment of the City Court. The remedy was by appeal. (Mantha Co., Inc., v. Pirseh & Sons Co., 222 App. Div. 440; Handshaw v. Arthur, 9 id. 175; affd,, 161 N. Y. 664; East Syracuse Motor Car Co. v. Tuttle, 230 App. Div, 872.) Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Featherly, 242 A.D. 886, 275 N.Y.S. 256 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).
242 A.D. 886 (Smith v. Featherly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Handshaw v. . Arthur
57 N.E. 1111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
William L. Mantha Co. v. Peter Pirsch & Sons Co.
222 A.D. 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
East Syracuse Motor Car Co. v. Tuttle
230 A.D. 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)