Handshaw v. . Arthur

57 N.E. 1111, 161 N.Y. 664, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1536
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 1900·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.

Concur: Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Not voting: Parker, Ch. J. Not sitting: Cullen, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Handshaw v. . Arthur, 57 N.E. 1111, 161 N.Y. 664, 1900 N.Y. LEXIS 1536 (N.Y. 1900).

57 N.E. 1111 (Handshaw v. . Arthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Mannix
30 Misc. 2d 613 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Bienenstock v. McCoy
194 Misc. 927 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Smith v. Featherly
242 A.D. 886 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
William L. Mantha Co. v. Peter Pirsch & Sons Co.
222 A.D. 440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Kellan v. McLean
120 Misc. 284 (New York County Courts, 1923)
People v. Harber
100 A.D. 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Lurman v. Jarvie
82 A.D. 37 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)