Smith v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Smith v. Dunn

263 So. 2d 722, 262 La. 455, 1972 La. LEXIS 4983

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 29, 1972

DocketNo. 52602

StatusPublished

This text of 263 So. 2d 722 (Smith v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Dunn, 263 So. 2d 722, 262 La. 455, 1972 La. LEXIS 4983 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

'The petition of the relators in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of October, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relators herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relators should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

'The petition of the relators in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable John S. Covington, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of October, 1972, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relators herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondents through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relators should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 So. 2d 722, 262 La. 455, 1972 La. LEXIS 4983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dunn-la-1972.