Smith v. Dixie Oil Co.

101 So. 24, 156 La. 691, 1924 La. LEXIS 2081
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 12, 1924
DocketNo. 26371
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 101 So. 24 (Smith v. Dixie Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Dixie Oil Co., 101 So. 24, 156 La. 691, 1924 La. LEXIS 2081 (La. 1924).

Opinion

By the WHOLE COURT.

ROGERS, J.

Under a mineral lease from the state of Louisiana defendant drilled an oil well in the bed of Black bayou in sec. 13, T. 21 N., R. 15 W., Caddo parish.

The well was brought in as a producer, and thereafter plaintiff filed this suit, alleging that he was in actual possession, as owner, of Sec. 12, T. 21 N., R. 15 W., Caddo parish, and that he was the holder of a mineral lease covering a tract of land in the northeast quarter of section 13, same township and range; alleging that there runs through the lands in sections 12 and 13 “a shallow and nonnavigable stream known as Black bayou,” on the east side of which abuts the lands. possessed by him; alleging that as the proprietor and possessor of the east bank of said bayou he owns and possesses the bed of said stream to its center, and has been in actual physical possession thereof for more than twelve months; alleging that the defendant entered and trespassed upon that part of the bed of Black bayou belonging to petitioner by drilling the well hereinbefore referred to. Plaintiff prayed to'be maintained in quiet and peaceful possession of said land, for restraining orders, sequestration, and for the value of the oil removed and extracted from the land and disposed of by defendant.

Defendant, for answer, denied plaintiff’s possession, and alleged that Black bayou was a navigable stream, or, in the alternative, that it was a navigable stream in the year 1812, when Louisiana was admitted into the Union. Defendant further alleged that the bed of said bayou on which the well was-drilled was the property of the state by virtue of its sovereignty, and that it was occu[693]*693pied by defendant under the terms of an oil and gas lease from said state.

The state of Louisiana, through its Attorney General, intervened for the purpose ■of resisting the demands of plaintiff and to protect the possession and rights of defend■ant.

Mrs. Sarah J. Robertshaw, Mrs. Ethel Dillon Walsh, and Mrs. Katherine Reid likewise intervened, alleging that they were the owners in possession of the property in controversy, and that defendant had trespassed on said property by drilling- an oil well thereon. Interveners prayed to be decreed the owners of the property and the oil, and for an accounting of the production of the well.

The court below rejected the demands of plaintiff and of Mrs. Sarah J. Robertshaw, Mrs. Ethel Dillon Walsh, and Mrs. Katherine Reid, interveners, and dismissed the suit and intervention. From this judgment plaintiff and said inte'rveners have appealed.

The paramount issue presented by the pleadings is the navigability, vel non, of Black bayou in 1812, the year of the admission of Louisiana into the Union. If the stream was navigable at that date, its bed belongs to the state. If it was not navigable at that time the ownership of the bed of the bayou must be determined as between plaintiff and the Robertshaw interveners.

The lines of investigation to determine the controversy led through the examination of such witnesses as were able to give testimony in regard to facts bearing upon the issue, such as the actual navigation by steamboats and other craft' and the physical conditions of the stream within their knowledge; through the examination of historical records, of surveys, past and present, and of photographs; and through consideration of the opinions of pre-eminent geologists and ecologists, based upon careful study of the physical characteristics of the bayou and the sources of its water supply.

The district judge, who heard the evidence and had before him each exhibit as it was offered, held that Black bayou was a navigable stream in 1812, and from our painstaking examination of the record we have reached the same conclusion.

Black bayou has its source in the state of Texas, and enters the state of Louisiana in the northwestern corner of the parish of Oaddo. It flows in a southeasterly direction through the northern portion of the parish, and empties into Clear Lake. Clear Lake was one of a chain of navigable lakes, all connected, but separately named which, prior to the removal of the Great Raft from Red River, existed on the west bank of the river above Shreveport. The' other lakes were known as Cross, Ferry, Sodo and Shift Tail Lakes. With their connecting bayous, among which were Black bayou, Red bayou, Stumpy bayou and Twelve Mile bayou, this chain of lakes extended for over 100 miles, and was the steamboat route from Shreveport to Jefferson, Tex. At a point about 1 mile south of Rodessa, La., where the Kansas City Southern Railroad crosses the stream, Black bayou is a small creek, but has a definite channel. It then spreads out into a large swamp, but after leaving the swamp, and about 3 miles above i'ts confluence with Kelly bayou, a tributary from the north, it again assumes a well-defined channel. Thereafter the bayou flows more directly south and takes its position in the Red River Valley at the foot of the slope away from the river. At about half a mile south of the junction of Kelly bayou and Black bayou the latter stream crosses the west line of section 12, and about a half a mile further south, it meets a waterway known as “Sewall’s canal,” which connects Black bayou and Red bayou. The well in controversy was drilled in the bed of Black bayou between the last designated points in section 13 at a spot opposite Irving’s Bluff-, and is situated about [695]*695200 feet northwest of the junction between Black bayou and the so-called Sewall’s canal.

Prom the point where it intersects the west line of section 12 to its mouth at Clear Lake, Black bayou flows through sections 13, 24, 23, 26, 27, and 28. During the whole of this stretch the bayou possesses a broad deep channel with well-defined but gently sloping and'well-rounded banks. On the line between sections 11 and 12 Black bayou is 250 feet wide; on the line between sections 12 and 13 it is 471 feet wide. On the various section lines between Sewall’s canal and its mouth, the width of the stream is even greater, being at one point 680 feet wide. The depth of its water varies from a minimum of 7 feet on the line between sections 11 and 12 to a maximum of 26 feet on the line between sections 27 and 28.

In the year 1812 the bayou was approximately the same width as it is now, but its depth was greater. This is shown by existing facts within the memory of living witnesses; by the results of the geological and ecological observations made by eminent scientists; and by the historical data assembled in connection with inquiry.

About the year 1777 the head of the Great Raft, which had been in the process of formation in Red river for many years, reached a point above the present site of the city of Shreveport, causing the water of the river to back up and overflow into the Black bayou basin. This resulted in the precipitation of practically two-thirds of the Red river water through the bayou, raising its level, and creating Clear, Sodo, Perry, and other lakes. The situation remained unchanged until 1873. In that year the United States government completed its operations for the removal of the raft, which it had begun, through Captain Henry Shreve, in 1833. Thereafter Red river, except in the overflow periods, carried its own water, thereby reducing the general water level of Black bayou and its chain of connected lakes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Opinion Number
Louisiana Attorney General Reports, 2001
Shell Oil Co. v. Pitman
476 So. 2d 1031 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Ramsey River Road Property Owners Ass'n v. Reeves
396 So. 2d 873 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1981)
Ramsey River Road Property Owners Ass'n v. Reeves
387 So. 2d 1194 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1980)
Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jones
98 So. 2d 236 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1957)
Transcontinental Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Co.
24 So. 2d 248 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1945)
State v. Aucoin
20 So. 2d 136 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1944)
State v. Jefferson Island Salt Mining Co.
163 So. 145 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Seibert v. Conservation Commission
159 So. 375 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Boone v. Kingsbury
273 P. 797 (California Supreme Court, 1928)
State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co.
113 So. 833 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)
Bodcaw Lumber Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. Kendall
108 So. 664 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 24, 156 La. 691, 1924 La. LEXIS 2081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-dixie-oil-co-la-1924.