Smith v. District of Columbia
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CASSANDRA SMITH,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2020 (JEB/RMM) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate
Judge Robin M. Meriweather on August 8, 2018. The 14-day period during which the parties
may file objections to the Report has expired, see Local Civil Rule 72.3(b), and
neither party has filed.
Plaintiff Cassandra Smith, on behalf of her minor child N.M., brought this action seeking
reimbursement of the fees and costs incurred by her attorney in this Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act matter. See ECF No. 1. After a briefing schedule was issued, she moved for fees
on December 7, 2017. See ECF No. 9. In a thorough 23-page Report, Judge Meriweather
recommended granting much of her request and awarding $86,208.98 in fees and $2,695.50 in
costs. See ECF No. 15.
After consideration of the Report, the absence of any party’s objection thereto, the entire
record before the Court, and the applicable law, the Court will adopt the Report and grant in part
and deny in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs.
1 A separate final Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: August 27, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. District of Columbia (Smith v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.