Smith v. Cushman

59 N.H. 519
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CliAUK, J.

The court is of opinion that the motion for a rehearing should be denied. At the trial term, if it appears that the newly discovered evidence raises nothing for the consideration of the jury, but a mere question for the court, by which the former trial'could not be affected in a manner unjust to the defendant, the presiding judge will determine whether justice requires a new trial of this point only by the court, and make such order as justice requires. No question of mere law is now presented which we can *520 see must necessarily be tried by tbe court, and the question raised is sent to the trial term. Gamsby v. Columbia, 58 N. H. 60.

Motion for rehearing “denied.

Smith, J., did not sit i the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Cushman, 59 N.H. 519 (N.H. 1880).

59 N.H. 519 (Smith v. Cushman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merrill v. Perkins
61 N.H. 262 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1881)