Smith v. Cushman
This text of 59 N.H. 519 (Smith v. Cushman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court is of opinion that the motion for a rehearing should be denied. At the trial term, if it appears that the newly discovered evidence raises nothing for the consideration of the jury, but a mere question for the court, by which the former trial'could not be affected in a manner unjust to the defendant, the presiding judge will determine whether justice requires a new trial of this point only by the court, and make such order as justice requires. No question of mere law is now presented which we can *520 see must necessarily be tried by tbe court, and the question raised is sent to the trial term. Gamsby v. Columbia, 58 N. H. 60.
Motion for rehearing “denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.H. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-cushman-nh-1880.