Gamsby v. Columbia

58 N.H. 60
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stanley, J.

There is no cause for a new trial. Nims v. Bigelow, 44 N. H. 876, 880-882; The King v. Woolf, 1 Bennett & Heard Ld. Cr. Cases (2d ed.) 496. The case should not be so amended as to bring the evidence to the law term. The facts on which a motion for a new trial is based should be settled at the trial term.

Judgment on the verdict.

Bingham, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gamsby v. Columbia, 58 N.H. 60 (N.H. 1876).

58 N.H. 60 (Gamsby v. Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edwards v. Tilton Mills
50 A. 102 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1900)
Merrill v. Perkins
61 N.H. 262 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1881)
Smith v. Cushman
59 N.H. 519 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1880)