Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 1, 2009·No. 09-1902·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1902

WESLEY EDWARD SMITH, III,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, et al.; TIM KAINE, Governor; J. KIRK DE COURCEY SHOWALTER; VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS; JAMES VAN INGOLD; ROBERT A. DYBING,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00800-REP)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wesley Edward Smith, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia; Robert A. Dybing, John Adrian Gibney, Jr., THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wesley Edward Smith, III, appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his civil complaint and denying leave to amend

the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Smith v. Virginia, No. 3:08-cv-00800-REP

(E.D. Va. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia, (4th Cir. 2009).

Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.