Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia

290 F. App'x 619

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 29, 2008·No. No. 08-6235·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Smith, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Virginia, No. 2:06-cv-00643-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Paul Smith, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Virginia, No. 2:06-cv-00643-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 290 F. App'x 619 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

290 F. App'x 619 (Smith v. Commonwealth of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related