Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4 Sarah Jane Smith, No. CV-20-00089-TUC-JAS (EJM) 5 Plainuff, ORDER 6 Vv. 7 Commissioner of — Social Security Administration, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 11 || Magistrate Judge Markovich that recommends remand this matter for further 12 || administrative proceedings. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 13 || any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has || expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 15 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge || Markovich’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. 17||_ R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley || v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 29 || (1) Magistrate Judge Markovich’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is accepted and 91 || adopted. || (2) This matter is remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the 23 || Report and Recommendation adopted herein. || (3) The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. 25 Dated this 29th day of November, 2021. 26 27 \ _ — ¢ 28 Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge