Smith v. Brown & Co.

85 S.E. 950, 16 Ga. App. 608, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 152
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 29, 1915
Docket6198
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 S.E. 950 (Smith v. Brown & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Brown & Co., 85 S.E. 950, 16 Ga. App. 608, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 152 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury’s finding that credit for the goods included in the account sued on was extended by the plaintiff to the defendant (a married woman) in her individual capacity, and that she was liable for the same. See Connerat v. Goldsmith, 6 Ga. 14; Mitchell v. Treanor, 11 Ga. 324 (3, 4), 326 (56 Am. D. 421); Schofield v. Jones, 85 Ga. 816, 824 (11 S. E. 1032); Goodson v. Powell, 9 Ga. App. 497 (71 S. E. 765); Reynolds v. Starks, ante, 606 (85 S. E. 950).

2. The evidence authorized the verdict. There was no material error of law; and the judgment of the appellate division of the municipal court, refusing a new trial, is Affirmed.

Russell, G. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia Grocery Co. v. Brunson
101 S.E. 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 950, 16 Ga. App. 608, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-brown-co-gactapp-1915.