Goodson v. Powell
71 S.E. 765, 9 Ga. App. 497, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 204
Opinion
While a wife has prima facie authority to bind her husband in the purchase of necessaries for herself and their children, still the husband is.not bound when it affirmatively appears that the tradesman contracted with the wife individually, and extended the credit to her in her individual capacity, and that both parties to the contract so understood. Mitchell v. Treanor, 11 Ga. 324 (56 Am. Dec. 421).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goodson v. Powell, 71 S.E. 765, 9 Ga. App. 497, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 204 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).
71 S.E. 765 (Goodson v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Herring v. Holden
76 S.E.2d 515 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Alexander v. Duffee-Freeman Furniture Co.
183 S.E. 86 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Butler v. Godley
181 S.E. 494 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Frankel v. Davison-Paxon Co.
180 S.E. 771 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Manley v. Chamberlin-Johnson-Dubose Co.
151 S.E. 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Morrison v. Evans
120 S.E. 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Georgia Grocery Co. v. Brunson
101 S.E. 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Smith v. Brown & Co.
85 S.E. 950 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)