Smith v. Averill

1 Barb. 28
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 11, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 1 Barb. 28 (Smith v. Averill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Averill, 1 Barb. 28 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

Edmonds, J.

If the facts as to the existence of the partnership were to be gone into, that would be a good reason, perhaps, for changing the venue. But as the plaintiffs’ attorney swears that their case rests upon another ground, viz., representations made in New-York by the defendants, respecting the partnership; and as he now offers to stipulate not to give any [29]*29other evidence of the partnership than those representations, the venue may be retained in New-York, upon the giving of such a stipulation.

■a

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Barb. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-averill-nysupct-1847.