Smith v. ANONYMOUS JOINT ENTERPRISE

771 N.W.2d 796
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 138456·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

771 N.W.2d 796 (2009)

Derith SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ANONYMOUS JOINT ENTERPRISE, George Preston, Mary Barrows, Village of Suttons Bay, and Charles Stewart, Defendants, and
Donald Barrows, John Stanek, and Noel Flohe, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket Nos. 138456, 138457, 138458. COA Nos. 275297, 275316, 275463.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 16, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining that the plaintiff presented insufficient evidence to support a finding of actual malice for purposes of her defamation claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. ANONYMOUS JOINT ENTERPRISE, 771 N.W.2d 796 (Mich. 2009).

771 N.W.2d 796 (Smith v. ANONYMOUS JOINT ENTERPRISE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheiko v. Underground Railroad
771 N.W.2d 796 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)