Smith v. Amherst Acres, Inc.

43 A.D.2d 792, 350 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2982
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 1973·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument of appeal, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, denied in all respects except that the decision of the court heretofore entered on October 26, 1973 is hereby amended to read as follows: Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The order of Special Term should be affirmed insofar as it vacated the order to show cause temporarily prohibiting North Forest Apartments, Inc., from transferring a mortgage given to it by COR Enterprises, Inc. The issue on this appeal is whether the appellant creditor can satisfy a claim against his debtor by levying on an asset owned by a party who owes a debt to the debtor. In this case appellant has attempted to levy upon a mortgage by North Forest Apartments, Inc., a corporation indebted to defendant Amherst Acres, Inc., in the amount of $60,000 and also to enjoin any transfer of the mortgage to respondents LoTempio and others. A creditor may satisfy his claim against a debt or property as the statute provides (CPLR 5201, 6202). He may levy on a debt owed to a defendant by another or property held by another in which a defendant has an interest (CPLR 5202, subd. [a]; 6214, subd. [a]). But [793]*793defendant Amherst Acres, Inc. had no property interest in the mortgage held by North Forest and a creditor stands in no better position with respect to property of the garnishee than does his debtor (cf. M. F. Hickey Go. v. Port of New York Auth., 23 A D 2d 739). Appellant’s only recourse, therefore, was to levy on North Forest’s debt to respondent Amherst Acres, Inc. If the garnishee refused to pay the Sheriff the amount of the debt owing to Amherst Acres, Inc., then appellant could institute á special enforcement proceeding directly against the garnishee (CPLR 6214, subd. [d]). Appellant’s interference with the mortgage asset of North Forest exceeded its power to reach property to satisfy his claim against Amherst Acres, Inc., and Fago. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term, removing injunction.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Moule, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Amherst Acres, Inc., 43 A.D.2d 792, 350 N.Y.S.2d 236, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

43 A.D.2d 792 (Smith v. Amherst Acres, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swezey v. Lynch
87 A.D.3d 119 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Bass v. Bass
140 A.D.2d 251 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
United States v. Benitez
779 F.2d 135 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Save Way Oil Co. v. 284 Eastern Parkway Corp.
115 Misc. 2d 141 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1982)
In re State Tax Commission v. Blanchard Management Corp.
108 Misc. 2d 770 (New York Supreme Court, 1981)