Smith v. AJ Contracting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. AJ Contracting Co.

277 A.D.2d 307, 716 N.Y.S.2d 326, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11699

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 307 (Smith v. AJ Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. AJ Contracting Co., 277 A.D.2d 307, 716 N.Y.S.2d 326, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion by the third-party defendant-respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 8, 1999, on the ground that it has been rendered academic, or, in the alternative, inter alia, to strike stated portions of the record on appeal. By decision and order on motion dated June 8, 2000, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal; it is

Ordered that the motion is denied (see, Smith v AJ Contr. Co., 277 AD2d 305 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion by the third-party defendant-respondent to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 8, 1999, on the ground that it has been rendered academic, or, in the alternative, inter alia, to strike stated portions of the record on appeal. By decision and order on motion dated June 8, 2000, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal; it is

Ordered that the motion is denied (see, Smith v AJ Contr. Co., 277 AD2d 305 [decided herewith]). Ritter, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 307, 716 N.Y.S.2d 326, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-aj-contracting-co-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack