Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, in Error v. Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson

50 U.S. 602, 13 L. Ed. 276, 9 How. 602, 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1446
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 20, 1850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript, of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire,.of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, in Error v. Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson, 50 U.S. 602, 13 L. Ed. 276, 9 How. 602, 1850 U.S. LEXIS 1446 (1850).

50 U.S. 602 (Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, in Error v. Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hogan v. Ross Ex Rel. Patterson
50 U.S. 602 (Supreme Court, 1850)