Hogan v. Ross Ex Rel. Patterson

50 U.S. 602, 9 How. 602
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 20, 1850
StatusPublished

This text of 50 U.S. 602 (Hogan v. Ross Ex Rel. Patterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogan v. Ross Ex Rel. Patterson, 50 U.S. 602, 9 How. 602 (1850).

Opinion

50 U.S. 602 (1850)
9 How. 602

SMITH HOGAN, ARTHUR S. HOGAN, AND RICHARD Y. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
AARON ROSS, WHO SUES FOR THE USE OF ROBERT PATTERSON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Order.

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire, of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 U.S. 602, 9 How. 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-ross-ex-rel-patterson-scotus-1850.