Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams

131 So. 335, 100 Fla. 660
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 6, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Upon rehearing Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice WHITFIELD and Mr. Justice STRUM are of opinion that the decree in this cause should be reversed, while Mr. Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice BROWN are of opinion that the decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body, and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams, 131 So. 335, 100 Fla. 660 (Fla. 1930).

131 So. 335 (Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Hester v. State Board of Administration
30 So. 2d 356 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
Webb v. Scott
176 So. 442 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)