State v. Florida Inland Navigation District

122 So. 249, 97 Fla. 839
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 122 So. 249 (State v. Florida Inland Navigation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Florida Inland Navigation District, 122 So. 249, 97 Fla. 839 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

Proceedings were instituted under the statutes, Sections 3296 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats, of 1920, *840 Sections 5106 et seq., Comp. Gen. Laws 1927, Chapter 10036, Acts of 1925, Sections 5113 et seq., Comp. Gen. Laws 1927, to validate $1,887,000.00 of bonds proposed to be issued by the Florida Inland Navigation District under Chapter 12026, Acts of 1927. Of the total bond issue, $750,000.00 are for the purchase price of an inland waterway and canal extending from the St. Johns River in Duval County, Florida, southward through the counties of Duval, St. Johns, Flagler, Volusia, Brevard, St. Lucie, Martin, Indian River, Palm Beach, Broward and Dade, to the waters of Biscayne Bay in said Dade County, formerly constructed and owned by the Florida Coast Line Canal and Transportation Company, though the purchase price is $725,000.00. The remainder of the bond issue, viz: $1,-137.000. 00 is for the estimated price of a right of way 200 feet wide along the line of said canal and such additional property outside of the said 200-foot right of way that may be necessary for the construction, maintenance and operation of said canal.

Demurrers raising questions as to the validity of Chap. 12026 Acts of 1927, were overruled and the issue of $1,-887.000. 00 of bonds was validated. The State and two intervenors appealed.

Chapter 12026, Acts of 1927, a special law, provides that designated counties of the State are “created and incorporated” “into a special tax district to be known as the ‘Florida Inland Navigation District’;” creates a governing body of eleven members to be known “as the ‘Board of Commissioners of Florida Inland Navigation District’,” the first members to be appointed by the Governor and their successors to be elected, who “shall have all powers of a body corporate, including the power to sue and be .sued as a corporation,” “to make contracts, to adopt a commercial seal” and to have other stated powers.

*841 The Board is “authorized and empowered to contract for the purchase of and to purchase from the Florida Coast Line Canal and Transportation Company and or from its successor in the title and or assigns, all the right, title, interest, property and franchise of, in and to that certain inland waterway and canal extending from the St. Johns River in Duval County, Florida, southward through the Counties of Duval, St. Johns, Flagler, Yolusia, Brevard, St. Lucie, Martin, Indian River, Palm Beach, Broward and Dade to the waters of Biscayne Bay in said Dade County, formerly constructed and owned by the said Florida Coast Line Canal and Transportation Company. That for the said Canal, waterway, properties and franchise the said Commissioners are authorized to pay, as the price and consideration therefor, a sum not exceeding Eight Hundred Thousand Dollars.”

“When the said Commissioners shall have purchased or contracted to purchase the said canal, properties and franchise it shall be the duty of the said Board of Commissioners of the Florida Inland Navigation District, by proper resolution of said Board to issue bonds of the said District in an amount sufficient to pay off the amount of the said purchase price and interest. Such bonds shall be in such denomination, shall run for such period of time, not exceeding twenty years, and shall bear such rate of interest, not exceeding six per cent per annum, as shall be fixed by said Board of Commissioners.

“When the said Board of Commissioners of the Florida Inland Navigation District shall have purchased or contracted to purchase the said canal, properties and franchise mentioned, they shall proceed without delay to secure by gift, donation, purchase or by condemnation a right of way along the line of said canal to the extent that the right of way shall be two hundred feet wide along the length there *842 of. Provided, that should there be places or sections of said canal, where it is found impossible to secure a right of way two hundred feet wide, they are authorized to secure a right of way of less width. That in order to secure the funds with which to pay for the right of way so secured, the said Board be and they are hereby authorized to issue interest bearing coupon bonds in the same manner and like tenor as the bonds authorized to be issued for the purchase of the canal, properties and franchise. That the said Board shall also secure by gift, donation, purchase or by condemnation any property outside of the said two hundred foot right of way that may be necessary for the construction, maintenance and operation of said canal, the price and consideration for which shall be paid in the same manner in which the right of way is paid for.”

“The said Board of Commissioners shall have and are hereby given the right and power of eminent domain, and may thereby acquire by condemnation proceedings any'real property necessary for the construction, maintenance and operation of the said canal and waterway. Such power of condemnation and or eminent domain shall be exercised in the same manner as is now provided by the general law of the State of Florida for the exercise of eminent domain and or condemnation by counties, cities and towns of the State of Florida. Just compensation shall be paid for all property taken under the provisions of this Act. The benefits to the abutting property shall be taken into consideration in arriving at the damages and compensation to be paid for any property taken. ’ ’

“That in order to meet and pay the necessary expenses in the survey and expenditures incident to securing such additional right of way and other necessary expenses of the Board of Commissioners the said Commissioners be and they are hereby authorized to borrow a sufficient amount of *843 money for such purposes not exceeding $100,000.00, and to execute their promissory notes for money so borrowed, and pay interest thereon not exceeding eight per cent. It shall be the duty of the Board of Commissioners to annually assess and levy against, the taxable property in said District a tax not to exceed one-half mill on the dollar for each year until canal, property and franchise shall be conveyed to the United States or until all indebtedness of said District, other than the bonded indebtedness shall have been paid. The proceeds from such tax to be used by said Commission for all expenses other than the purchase price of the present canal, properties and franchise, and the purchase price of additional right of way. ’ ’

“The Board of Commissioners of said Florida Inland Navigation District is hereby authorized' and empowered and directed annually to levy upon all the real and personal property in said District a sufficient tax (not to exceed one mill on the dollar for each and every year) to pay the interest and provide and maintain a sinking fund for the payment of the interest and principal of the bonds provided for and authorized by this Act.”

It is contended that the provisions of Chapter 12026 relating to the issuing of bonds and the levying of taxes to pay for the right of way along the line of the canal, authorized to be purchased, are an unlawful delegation of the taxing power to statutory district officers in that no limit is placed upon its indebtedness to be incurred or the bonds to be issued, or the tax that may be levied for the purchase price of such right of way.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coon v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF OKALOOSA CTY.
203 So. 2d 497 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Dover Drainage District v. Pancoast
135 So. 518 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams
131 So. 335 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 So. 249, 97 Fla. 839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-florida-inland-navigation-district-fla-1929.