Smestad v. Harris
This text of 2011 ND 91 (Smestad v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 5/11/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 81
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Donald Beane, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20100340 & 20100341
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Gerald H. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nathan Kirke Madden (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2047, Williston, N.D. 58802, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (on brief), P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Beane
[¶1] Donald Beane appeals from criminal judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of a controlled substance, a class C felony, and possession of drug paraphernalia, a class C felony. On appeal, Beane argues the district court committed reversible error when it refused to admit Beane’s pants into evidence due to a violation of N.D.R.Crim.P. 16. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smestad-v-harris-nd-2011.