Smart v. NCAA

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 16, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-02125·Unknown

Opinion

1 GARRETT R. BROSHUIS CAROLYN H. LUEDTKE (Bar No. 329924) (State Bar No. 207976) 2 gbroshuis@koreintillery.com carolyn.luedtke@mto.com KOREIN TILLERY, LLC JUSTIN P. RAPHAEL 3 505 North 7th Street, Suite 3600 (State Bar No. 292380) St. Louis, MO 63101 Justin.Raphael@mto.com 4 Telephone: (314) 241-4844 CHRISTOPHER CRUZ Facsimile: (314) 241-3525 (State Bar No. 346128) 5 Christopher.Cruz@mto.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Taylor JAVIER KORDI 6 Smart and Michael Hacker, (State Bar No. 348358) Individually and on Behalf of All Javier.Kordi@mto.com 7 Those Similarly Situated MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP [additional attorneys listed on 560 Mission Street, 27th Flr 8 signature page] San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 9 DENNIS STEWART (State Bar No. 99152) Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 dstewart@gustafsongluek.com 10 GUSTAFSON GLUEK PLLC Attorneys for Defendant 600 West Broadway, Suite 3300 National Collegiate Athletic 11 San Diego, CA 92101 Association, an Telephone: (612) 333-8844 Unincorporated Association. 12 Facsimile: (612) 339-6622

13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Joseph Colon, Shannon Ray, Khala Taylor, 14 Peter Robinson, Katherine Sebbane, and Patrick Mehlert, Individually 15 and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated [additional 16 attorneys listed on signature page]

17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 TAYLOR SMART AND MICHAEL HACKER, No. 2:22-cv-02125 WBS KJN 19 Individually and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated, Chief United States Magistrate 20 Plaintiffs, J Au sd sg ie g nK ee dn d fa ol rl nJ o. n -N de iw sm pa on s i( tK iJ vN e) 21 NATIOv N. A L COLLEGIATE ASSOCIATION, an matters 22 unincorporated association, Defendant. 23 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER JOSEPH COLON, SHANNON RAY, KHALA 24 TAYLOR, PETER ROBINSON, KATHERINE No. 1:23-cv-00425 WBS KJN SEBBAME, and PATRICK MEHLER, 25 individually and on behalf of all Chief United States Magistrate those similarly situated, Judge Kendall J. Newman (KJN) 26

v. Plaintiffs, A ms as ti tg en re sd for non-dispositive 27 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, 1 2 I. INTRODUCTION

3 The parties, by their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. 4 R. Civ. P. 26(c)(1), hereby stipulate to the following 5 provisions. 6 II. SCOPE OF PROTECTED INFORMATION 7 In the course of discovery in this action, the parties may 8 be required to produce information that constitutes, in whole or 9 10 in part, protected information such as trade secrets, non-public 11 research and development, commercial or financial information, or 12 other information that may cause harm to the Producing Party or a 13 non-party. The parties anticipate production of the following 14 categories of protected information: 15 A. “Confidential” information: 16 1. Information (regardless of how it is generated, 17 stored, or maintained) or tangible things that 18 19 qualify for protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); 20 2. Information protected from disclosure by statute; 21 3. Information that reveals trade secrets; 22 4. Research, technical, commercial, or financial 23 information that the party has maintained as 24 confidential; 25 5. Medical information and protected health information 26 27 concerning any individual; 1 6. Personal identifying information of any person who is 2 not a party to this action, including absent class 3 members; 4 7. Any information whose disclosure would cause severe 5 competitive harm to the Designating Party if 6 7 disclosed; 8 8. Personnel or employment records of a person who is 9 not a party to this action, 10 9. Education records concerning any individual; and 11 10. Other information the disclosure of which would 12 breach a legal or contractual obligation. 13 B. “Confidential” Information under this order does not 14 include any information that 15 16 1. is publicly available at the time of disclosure and 17 became publicly available through lawful means and 18 without the violation of any court orders; 19 2. becomes publicly available after disclosure through 20 no fault of the Receiving Party (defined below); or 21 3. the Receiving Party lawfully obtains at a later date 22 from a third party without restriction as to 23 24 disclosure. 25 C. “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” information: 26 1. Documents, testimony, or information that contains, 27 or is reasonably believed to contain, or is claimed 1 by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 2 U.S.C. § 1232g, and any regulations passed pursuant 3 to that Act by the Department of Education or any 4 other federal agency (“FERPA Records”) of any student 5 who has not consented to the disclosure of such 6 7 records; and 8 2. Other non-public, extremely sensitive confidential 9 information, disclosure of which the Designating 10 Party believes in good faith would create a 11 substantial risk of serious financial, reputational, 12 or other harm, or a serious violation of a privacy 13 interest that could not be avoided by less 14 restrictive means. 15 16 III. DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED INFORMATION

17 A. Scope: This Order governs the production and handling 18 of any protected information in this action. Any party or non- 19 party who produces protected information in this action may 20 designate it as “Confidential” or “Attorneys’ Eyes Only” 21 consistent with the terms of this Order. “Designating Party” 22 means the party or non-party who so designates the protected 23 information; “Receiving Party” means the party or non-party to 24 25 whom such information was produced or disclosed. Whenever 26 possible, the Designating Party must designate only those 27 portions of a document, deposition, transcript, or other material 1 designating entire documents. Regardless of any designations 2 made hereunder, the Designating Party is not otherwise restricted 3 from use or disclosure of its protected information outside of 4 this action. In addition, any party may move to modify or seek 5 other relief from any of the terms of this Order if it has first 6 7 tried in writing and in good faith to resolve its needs or 8 disputes with the other party(ies) pursuant to the terms of this 9 Order and E.D. Cal. L.R. 251, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and 37. 10 B. Application to Non-Parties: Before a non-party is given 11 copies of designated information as permitted hereunder, it must 12 first sign the acknowledgment to be bound to these terms that is 13 attached hereto as Exhibit A; if it fails to do so, the parties 14 to this action must resolve any such dispute before making 15 16 disclosure of designated information as permitted hereunder to 17 the non-party. If a non-party wishes to make designations 18 hereunder, it must first sign the acknowledgment to be bound to 19 these terms that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 20 C. Timing and Provisional Protection: Designations may be 21 made at any time. To avoid potential waiver of protection 22 hereunder, the Designating Party should designate information at 23 24 the time of production or disclosure, including on the record 25 during the taking of any testimony. Deposition testimony will be 26 deemed provisionally protected for a period of 15 days after the 27 transcript is released to the parties by the court reporter, 1 of provisional protection of information as Confidential or 2 Attorneys’ Eyes Only as part of one or more specific depositions. 3 To retain any designations beyond the provisional period, a 4 Designating Party must designate specific pages and lines of 5 deposition testimony before the provisional period has expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smart v. NCAA, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Smart v. NCAA (Smart v. NCAA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1232g
2 U.S.C. § 1232g