Smarr v. Colgrove
This text of 217 N.W. 775 (Smarr v. Colgrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was tried before the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. No request for findings of fact and of law was filed as required by Circuit Court Rule No. 45. No findings were filed. There is nothing before this court for review. Alexander Co. v. Griggs,
The judgment is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.
NORTH, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred.
Chief Justice FLANNIGAN and the late Justice BIRD took no part in this decision. *Page 57
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 N.W. 775, 242 Mich. 56, 1928 Mich. LEXIS 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smarr-v-colgrove-mich-1928.