Evangelist v. Falzerano

Michigan Supreme Court

Evangelist v. Falzerano

216 N.W. 369, 241 Mich. 62, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 976

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 1, 1927

DocketDocket No. 31.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 216 N.W. 369 (Evangelist v. Falzerano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Evangelist v. Falzerano, 216 N.W. 369, 241 Mich. 62, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 976 (Mich. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

This case was tried by the court without a jury. No findings were requested, made, or filed. We are therefore not informed as to the facts on which the trial court concluded as a matter of law that plaintiff could not recover on his claim nor defendant on his set-off. The statute and rule requiring findings of fact and conclusions of law in cases tried by the court without a jury have been of such long standing, and this court has so many times declined to decide cases on records such as the one before us, that it seems unnecessary to indulge in further discussion or statement. See Alexander Co. v.Griggs, 240 Mich. 71.

The judgment is affirmed.

BIRD, FLANNIGAN, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred.

The late Justice SNOW took no part in this decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case was tried by the court without a jury. No findings were requested, made, or filed. We are therefore not informed as to the facts on which the trial court concluded as a matter of law that plaintiff could not recover on his claim nor defendant on his set-off. The statute and rule requiring findings of fact and conclusions of law in cases tried by the court without a jury have been of such long standing, and this court has so many times declined to decide cases on records such as the one before us, that it seems unnecessary to indulge in further discussion or statement. See Alexander Co. v.Griggs, 240 Mich. 71.

The judgment is affirmed.

BIRD, FLANNIGAN, FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, and McDONALD, JJ., concurred.

The late Justice SNOW took no part in this decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 N.W. 369, 241 Mich. 62, 1927 Mich. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/evangelist-v-falzerano-mich-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack