Smalls v. Southern Railway Co.
41 S.E. 492, 115 Ga. 137, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 328
Opinion
It was, under the evidence in this case, exceedingly doubtful whether the plaintiff’s injuries resulted from the defective condition of the defendant’s locomotive, as alleged in his petition; but even upon the assumption that a defect existed which caused the injuries complained of, the judgment of nonsuit was right, for the plaintiff’s own testimony demanded a finding that he was fully aware of the existence of the defect and voluntarily and deliberately assumed the risk of being hurt in consequence thereof.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smalls v. Southern Railway Co., 41 S.E. 492, 115 Ga. 137, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 328 (Ga. 1902).
41 S.E. 492 (Smalls v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler v. Atlanta Buggy Co.
73 S.E. 25 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
McDonnell v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
44 S.E. 840 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)