Smalls v. Smith

73 A.D.3d 1367, 900 N.Y.S.2d 693
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smalls v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 A.D.3d 1358

Opinion

pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been returned to petitioner’s account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Rivera v Napoli, 69 AD3d 1284 [2010]; Matter of Covington v Smith, 68 AD3d 1430 [2009]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smalls v. Smith, 73 A.D.3d 1367, 900 N.Y.S.2d 693 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 1367 (Smalls v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Covington v. Smith
68 A.D.3d 1430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Rivera v. Napoli
69 A.D.3d 1284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)