Smalls v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smalls v. Smith

71 A.D.3d 1358, 896 N.Y.S.2d 695

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 1358 (Smalls v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smalls v. Smith, 71 A.D.3d 1358, 896 N.Y.S.2d 695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making a third-party telephone call. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been returned to petitioner’s account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lafferty v Fischer, 61 AD3d 1235, 1236 [2009]; Matter of Covington v Smith, 61 AD3d 1187 [2009]).

Cardona, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II prison disciplinary determination finding him guilty of making a third-party telephone call. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been returned to petitioner’s account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lafferty v Fischer, 61 AD3d 1235, 1236 [2009]; Matter of Covington v Smith, 61 AD3d 1187 [2009]).

Cardona, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 1358, 896 N.Y.S.2d 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smalls-v-smith-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack