Small v. M'Chesney
3 Cow. 19
Opinion
The party who moves has sustained no injuryby this proceeding. He does not shew that the money would [20]*20have been paid, and farther costs prevented, had execution keen delayed till after the filing of the record. The whole proceeding is on the same day, which the law will not divide fractions, unless this be necessary for the purpose of guarding against injustice. Here has been none. The objection is merely technical, and the technical answer is enough where there has been no injury from the proceeding;
Motion denied,!
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Small v. M'Chesney, 3 Cow. 19 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).
3 Cow. 19 (Small v. M'Chesney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Waterkeepers Northern California, a Non-Profit Corporation Dba Deltakeeper Bill Jennings v. Ag Industrial Manufacturing Inc. Claude E. Brown, Waterkeepers Northern California, a Non-Profit Corporation Dba Deltakeeper Bill Jennings v. Ag Industrial Manufacturing Inc. Claude E. Brown
375 F.3d 913 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Croveno v. . Atlantic Ave. R.R. Co.
44 N.E. 968 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)
Ganz v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.
29 N.Y.S. 810 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
William Ottmann & Co. v. Hoffman
28 N.Y.S. 28 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
People's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Batchelder Egg Case Co.
51 F. 130 (Eighth Circuit, 1892)
Pooley v. . City of Buffalo
26 N.E. 16 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Rogers v. Cherrier
43 N.W. 828 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1889)
Jasper v. Schlesinger
22 Ill. App. 637 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1887)
Blydenburgh v. Cotheal
5 How. Pr. 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)