Home/New York Court of Appeals/Blydenburgh v. Cotheal

Blydenburgh v. Cotheal

5 How. Pr. 200
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1851·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bronson, Ch. J.

As a general rule the court does not inquire into the fractions of a day, except for the purpose of guarding against injustice (Small vs. McChesney, 3 Cow. 19; Clute vs. Clute, 3 Denio, 263). We think that a sufficient answer to this motion. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blydenburgh v. Cotheal, 5 How. Pr. 200 (N.Y. 1851).

5 How. Pr. 200 (Blydenburgh v. Cotheal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ganz v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.
29 N.Y.S. 810 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)