Home/New York Court of Appeals/Blydenburgh v. Cotheal

Blydenburgh v. Cotheal

5 How. Pr. 200
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 15, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 How. Pr. 200 (Blydenburgh v. Cotheal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Blydenburgh v. Cotheal, 5 How. Pr. 200 (N.Y. 1851).

Opinion

Bronson, Ch. J.

As a general rule the court does not inquire into the fractions of a day, except for the purpose of guarding against injustice (Small vs. McChesney, 3 Cow. 19; Clute vs. Clute, 3 Denio, 263). We think that a sufficient answer to this motion. Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ganz v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.
29 N.Y.S. 810 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 How. Pr. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blydenburgh-v-cotheal-ny-1851.