Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Sampson

85 So. 501, 204 Ala. 240, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 110
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 14, 1920
Docket6 Div. 40.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 85 So. 501 (Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Sampson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Sampson, 85 So. 501, 204 Ala. 240, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 110 (Ala. 1920).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The judgment for the plaintiff in this cause was rendered on March *241 13, 1919, and defendant’s motion for new trial was overruled on May 31, 1919. The appeal is from the original judgment, and the bill of exceptions was presented to, the trial judge on June 12, 1919. As the 90 days within which the bill could be legally presented expired on June 11, 1919, the motion to strike the bill of exceptions must prevail. King v. Hill, 163 Ala. 423, 51 South. 15; Cassell’s Mill v. Strater Bros. Grain Co., 166 Ala. 274, 51 South. 969.

The assignments of error based on the record proper are waived, and, the other assignments on the bill of exceptions being eliminated, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

J. H. Arnold & Co. v. Jordan
112 So. 305 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)
General Ordnance Co. v. Bowen
96 So. 753 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
McMillon v. Skelton
95 So. 148 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
85 So. 501, 204 Ala. 240, 1920 Ala. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sloss-sheffield-steel-iron-co-v-sampson-ala-1920.