King v. Hill & Shafer Co.

51 So. 15, 163 Ala. 422, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 538
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 16, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 51 So. 15 (King v. Hill & Shafer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Hill & Shafer Co., 51 So. 15, 163 Ala. 422, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 538 (Ala. 1909).

Opinion

MAYFIELD, J.

This case is submitted on motion to strike the bill of exceptions and upon its merits.

Section 3019 of the Code of 1907 provides as follows: “Bills of exceptions may -be presented at any time with [423]*423in ninety days from the day on which the judgment is entered, and not afterwards; and all general, local, or special laws or rules of court in conflict with this section are repealed, abrogated, and annulled. The judge must endorse thereon and as a part of the bill, the true date of presenting, and the bill of exceptions must, if correct, be signed by him within ninety days thereafter.”

It affirmatively appears that the bill was not presented within the time required by statute, as to either the main trial or the motion for a new trial, and it must therefore be stricken on appellee’s motion. The judge had no right to receive it after the time for presenting had expired. The statute is explicit that it must be presented within 90 days, “and not afterwards.”

The bill of exceptions being stricken, the record proper shows no reversible error, and hence the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Dowdell, O. J., and Anderson and Sayre, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMillon v. Skelton
95 So. 148 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
National Pyrites & Copper Co. v. Williams
89 So. 291 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1921)
Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Sampson
85 So. 501 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Dement v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
80 So. 882 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1919)
Thacker v. City of Selma
77 So. 939 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Leeth v. Kornman, Sawyer & Co.
56 So. 757 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Smith v. Smith
53 So. 1009 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Turner v. Spragins
55 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)
Edinburgh-American Land Mortgage Co. v. Canterbury
53 So. 823 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 So. 15, 163 Ala. 422, 1909 Ala. LEXIS 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-hill-shafer-co-ala-1909.