Slater v. State

541 So. 2d 178, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 936, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1923, 1989 WL 34503
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1989·No. No. 88-911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SHARP, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant’s probation. We affirm the lower court’s finding that conditions 6 (violation of any state law), 8 (possession of a firearm) and 9 (possession of marijuana) had been violated. However, we amend the order to delete the finding that conditions 1, 13 and 16 were violated. As to condition 1 (failure to timely file a written report), the lower court’s written order did not conform to its oral pronouncement. Towson v. State, 382 So.2d 870 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). As to conditions 13 (payment of fees) and 16 (performance of community service), no evidence was adduced at the revocation hearing to support the charges. Jackson v. State, 449 So.2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

AFFIRMED as modified.

DANIEL and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slater v. State, 541 So. 2d 178, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 936, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1923, 1989 WL 34503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

541 So. 2d 178 (Slater v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McMahill v. State
826 So. 2d 525 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)