Slater v. State

522 So. 2d 106, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 743, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1134, 1988 WL 23392
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 1988
DocketNo. 87-3181
StatusPublished

This text of 522 So. 2d 106 (Slater v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Slater v. State, 522 So. 2d 106, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 743, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1134, 1988 WL 23392 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief on the grounds that the trial court considered portions of the record which directly refuted the claims made in appellant’s motion.

ANSTEAD, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 106, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 743, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1134, 1988 WL 23392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/slater-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.