Slate v. Potter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1203

JAMES E. SLATE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General,

Defendant – Appellee.

No. 09-1204

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; JEFFREY F. PEROTTA, Labor Relations Manager; ROY L. MONTAGUE, Postmaster,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:04-cv-00782-JAB; 1:05-cv-00221-JAB-PTS)

Submitted: January 29, 2010 Decided: February 16, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Slate, Appellant Pro Se. David Clifford Belt, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington D.C.; Lynne P. Klauer, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Shari A. Rose, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C. for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

James E. Slate appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Slate’s

civil actions. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Slate v. Potter, Nos. 1:04-cv-00782-

JAB; 1:05-cv-00221-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED