Slate v. Potter

Fourth Circuit

Slate v. Potter

365 F. App'x 470

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 16, 2010·No. Nos. 09-1203, 09-1204·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James E. Slate appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Slate’s civil actions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Slate v. Potter, Nos. 1:04-cv-00782-JAB; 1:05-cv-00221-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 80, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James E. Slate appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Slate’s civil actions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Slate v. Potter, Nos. 1:04-cv-00782-JAB; 1:05-cv-00221-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 80, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Slate v. Potter, 365 F. App'x 470 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

365 F. App'x 470 (Slate v. Potter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.