Slappy v. Bazzle

178 F. App'x 300
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 4, 2006·No. No. 05-7901·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Isaac Eugene Slappy, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his [301]*301petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Slappy has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Slappy v. Bazzle, No. CA-05-14-0-DCN (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2005). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slappy v. Bazzle, 178 F. App'x 300 (4th Cir. 2006).

178 F. App'x 300 (Slappy v. Bazzle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241
Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)