Slabakis v. Schik

2017 NY Slip Op 6884, 154 A.D.3d 407, 60 N.Y.S.3d 813
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2017·No. 4546 651986/15·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered August 19, 2016, which granted defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice and with leave to replead, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion by granting plaintiff leave to replead because one cannot determine, as a matter of law, that he will be unable to allege the requisite elements of the various causes of action (see e.g. Davis v Scottish Re Group Ltd., 138 AD3d 230, 236, 238 [1st Dept 2016]).

Plaintiff has since repled his complaint; thus, “the sufficiency of the allegations in the earlier complaint is rendered academic” (Peters v Peters, 118 AD3d 593, 594 [1st Dept 2014]).

Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Slabakis v. Schik, 2017 NY Slip Op 6884, 154 A.D.3d 407, 60 N.Y.S.3d 813 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 6884 (Slabakis v. Schik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd.
138 A.D.3d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Peters v. Peters
118 A.D.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)