Skinitis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Skinitis v. State

610 S.E.2d 571, 271 Ga. App. 549, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 444, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 103

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 9, 2005

DocketA04A2191

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 610 S.E.2d 571 (Skinitis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skinitis v. State, 610 S.E.2d 571, 271 Ga. App. 549, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 444, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Adams, Judge.

Louis Chris Skinitis was stopped for speeding, and he subsequently failed a field sobriety test. A search incident to his DUI arrest revealed marijuana in the driver’s side door. Following his negotiated [550]*550plea and conviction of speeding, driving under the influence, and possession of marijuana, Skinitis appeals the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress. We affirm.

Decided February 9, 2005. Jack J. Menendez, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Rosemary G. Heidmann, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

A defendant waives any error in the denial of his motion to suppress by pleading guilty; therefore, this Court is precluded from reviewing that decision. Thompson v. State, 240 Ga. App. 539, 540 (2) (524 SE2d 239) (1999); Barber v. State, 231 Ga. App. 176 (498 SE2d 758) (1998). See also Hooten v. State, 212 Ga. App. 770 (1) (442 SE2d 836) (1994). This is true even when the prosecutor and the trial court agree that if the defendant pleads guilty, he would still be able to appeal the issue. See Davis v. State, 251 Ga. App. 436 (554 SE2d 583) (2001).

Judgment affirmed.

Ruffin, C. J., and Bernes, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Adams, Judge.

Louis Chris Skinitis was stopped for speeding, and he subsequently failed a field sobriety test. A search incident to his DUI arrest revealed marijuana in the driver’s side door. Following his negotiated [550]*550plea and conviction of speeding, driving under the influence, and possession of marijuana, Skinitis appeals the denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress. We affirm.

Decided February 9, 2005. Jack J. Menendez, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, District Attorney, Rosemary G. Heidmann, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

A defendant waives any error in the denial of his motion to suppress by pleading guilty; therefore, this Court is precluded from reviewing that decision. Thompson v. State, 240 Ga. App. 539, 540 (2) (524 SE2d 239) (1999); Barber v. State, 231 Ga. App. 176 (498 SE2d 758) (1998). See also Hooten v. State, 212 Ga. App. 770 (1) (442 SE2d 836) (1994). This is true even when the prosecutor and the trial court agree that if the defendant pleads guilty, he would still be able to appeal the issue. See Davis v. State, 251 Ga. App. 436 (554 SE2d 583) (2001).

Judgment affirmed.

Ruffin, C. J., and Bernes, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

610 S.E.2d 571, 271 Ga. App. 549, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 444, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinitis-v-state-gactapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack